So it actually computes what we need it to compute.

So this is the same thing. So I said 3 and, 750,000 cupcakes and my cost was a 1.05.

I should be doing this in red, I'm not being consistent.

Now either one of these is legititmate ways of accounting but its good to know the difference

So that would be 1 million of revenue coming into the door per year.

Alright?

So let's look at possible theories.

Do you have any idea what that school is costing me?

Thank you.

Let's say there's very little labor at my factory.

And when I say book value, that's just a fancy way of saying this is what our accountants say that we paid for the stuff.

And this is what you'll see if you actually look at income statements for public companies.

I'll give you some examples.

So if I have a million cupcakes let me do this in red, I said I would do this in red.

Then you're just handing checks out to your cupcake eaters.

So I am able to charge 2 per cupcake, so my revenue is equal to 2 million per year. Right?

You'll see something like cost of goods or variable costs.

We know how much it takes to build our product.

Let me do that in red. I'll do all of these in red because these are I'll do that later.

That would have been the market value per share.

You know what happens at that point?

This watch is less expensive than that one.

(GUNSHOT)

Today as the spike in the price of oil

YASUKO KAWAKAMI

The only way to find its outcome is, effectively, just to watch it evolve.

And many of the things that are waiting in the wings today, will be made possible.

And we see that the last trade here was for 2.58.

My watch is less expensive than yours.

So I asked the Minister over dinner,

Its value is beyond estimation.

5,000 CHF for Willi and for Hans.

So this is a break even scenario, where I sell 500,000 cupcakes at 2 per cupcake, with this being the cost of goods.

Anyway, factory tooling.

Let me tell you about a truly magical algorithm called value iteration.

That's all the U.S. usage today.

Atom Up

Keeping ambiguity in mind, if this were a Python or JavaScript or even just on the whiteboard or on a piece of paper in mathematics, this is a mathematical expression.

And the answer is no, it isn't. It is somewhat inconsistent.

So how big is the nucleus?

I'll just call it overhead. I'll make it red because it's an expense.

From 2001 to 2005, 2006, houses were appreciating like 10 , 15 a year.

Upper total

Anyway, going back to Price to Earnings, we calculated the

So I'm really excited.