This step, for the anti hero, is seldom a matter of brave, wise and heroic opposition.

Tyrannical governments frequently gaol their political opponents.

Tyrannical governments frequently imprison their political opponents.

Tyrannical governments frequently put their political opponents in prison.

The government tried to suppress all opposition parties.

He defies the present government which is no less oppressive than its predecessor.

Now, if you're a marketer, you might then target them with product samples, try to spread your brand through their social group.

The government has held commodity prices in check.

The government clamped down on the minority group.

First one is the political system.

The government should endeavor to curb inflation.

Liberals have very noble motives for doing this.

The government oppressed the people.

It's not just that the rules are bad because the government is too strong and oppressive, as in North Korea.

In fact, some of them actually survived the Internet challenge, and some got even more repressive.

Human rights groups are putting pressure on authoritarian governments.

So the question I started my talk with, who do you think is more difficult to face, oppressive governments or oppressive societies?

The heat is on the administration to come up with a new policy.

So, we pick tactics accommodated to the event, especially this thing we call the small tactics of dispersion.

(Laughter)

Politics is not changing government is changing.

The government of that country oppresses its people.

That's what happens in some systems.

And then on the seventh of September, I was invited to New York.

Because you're creating artificial demand.

The government refuses to bow to public pressure.

North Korea, that is on the other side of the world, and is also one of the world's most oppressive regimes.

There's always an oppressor and an oppressed.

The government?

For six decades, the North Korean government, the North Korean regime has created this ruthlessly efficient system of political repression, denying even the most basic human rights to their own people.

And that regime that we got rid of was actually a dictatorship, an authoritarian regime, that for decades created a great sense of paralysis within the nation, within the people themselves.

If you ask people vague questions, like,

Not the government.

The king imposed heavy taxes on the people.

The king oppressed his people.

He became a symbol of hope against a system of injustice and corruption.

The traditional view, still enshrined in much of the way that we think about creativity

Because during conflict economic policy typically deteriorates.

His speech was an effective apology for the Government's policies.

So this is what I mean with a failing governance structure, because even the powerful government, which we have in Germany, comparatively, was not able to say,

Down with the Government!

This is what happened in Tunisia.

Dream states?

The government?

People in Paris said you know what? The King is going to try to suppress us again this is no good.