It matters because this is a democracy.

Before, revolutions used to have ideological names.

I see corporatism, fascism and crony capitalism

My topic is economic growth in China and India.

Let me look at this question more directly.

They use the energy, the strength and the lives of others, for their own economic prosperity.

Make a decision and give me some blood.

Presidential candidate Obama's economics team seems to be made up of distinguished neoliberals.

And I think the getaway message from that would be that Islam, despite some of the skeptics in the West, has the potential in itself to create its own way to democracy, create its own way to liberalism, create its own way to freedom.

Please raise your hand high right now. OK.

And what's more, converted it to liberalism.

I'm definitely a libertarian.

Democracy encourages freedom.

The foundation of free nations is democracy.

He is a so called liberal.

Individual freedom is the soul of democracy.

By that comparison, democracy looks very, very good in terms of economic growth.

Cause shit's fucked up and bullshit!

Freedom is the very essence of our democracy.

It is unlikely that the planet can support this many vehicles for long, regardless of their power source.

Maybe as people, because especially in Israel, we're in a democracy.

It has been reported that 32 trillion of paper assets were printed by one government alone.

Or to a president of Venezuela whose intolerance of the business class causes jubilation in the streets, but emigration by those whose initiative is crucial for the welfare of the people. Less damaging, yet problematic, is the election as in Poland of a minority government that ruthlessly pursues its members personal interests and breaks all promises of cooperation made before the polls.

Falk Zientz

But the pro E.U. sentiment in Turkey in the past decade has become almost an Islamic cause and supported by the Islamic liberals and the secular liberals as well, of course.

If you look at the statistical evidence worldwide, there's really no support for the idea that authoritarian governments hold a systematic edge over democracies in terms of economic growth.

The nonviolent struggle is won in the real world, in the streets.

He's referring to the huge bonuses and profits that are infuriating the public.

Courage. Truth. Justice.

He became financially independent.

That's part of the free market system, Obama continued.

The implication of that model is that democracy is a hindrance for economic growth, rather than a facilitator of economic growth.

That's a good point, Peter, and the answer is yes.

I'm going to quote from another magazine of the '60s.

And if you think about it, industrial capacity utilization, it matters, but it matters much more to manufacturing based economy.

One reviewer for a Roman Catholic newspaper called it totalitarian.

As opposed to communism, which suffocates the individual, and market liberalism which wants to isolate the individual the basic income facilitates a safeguard in order to maximize freedom, giving the individual the ability to choose.

A democrat is a free citizen who yields to the will of the majority.

He gave up the plan for economic reasons.

Then your equity would be worth 4 million.

Well, we've seen that that can't be true.

Give up your empiricism, Professor. Miracles are beyond empiricism.

There are many reasons to celebrate the current democratic wave. Democracy is associated with less injustice and abuse, with basic civic and political freedoms, and with greater sensitivity by governments for the true priorities of its citizens.

And the final one is that most anti economic of activities, but give.

And it's happening everywhere, among liberals and conservatives, agnostics and believers, the rich and the poor,