Chris Anderson We're having a debate.

The question excited much controversy.

The question is, which god was it?

The principal theme of the book is the American Revolution.

The matter of his successor is still under debate.

I think that's probably right, although this is a controversial issue.

Hotly debated topics proactive stance against discrimination and school busing.

The fundamental problem in arguing with a person who denies global warming is that they use erroneous logic.

Everybody I mean, we debate over what's fair but everybody agrees that harm and fairness matter.

His thesis doesn't make sense. To begin with, its theme is obscure.

All I want to do is... BANG, BANG, BANG, BANG and... (cocks gun register opens) ... and TAKE YOUR MONEY!

And it leads to reservations and other techniques.

Bill is skillful in arguing and debating.

A year later,

If you want the truth to stand clear before you, never be for or against.

A species that actually thrives on arguing.

Yeeralparil argued with the men.

We should confine the discussion to the question at issue.

One on the evolution intelligent design quote unquote debate.

I contended against falsehood.

They discussed the subject of the offender of the meaning of life.

That dispute has been settled once and for all.

The third set of ideas are what I call as

It's an idiotic debate. It has to stop.

We don't know where oil comes from. I mean,

But there wasn't any internal structure to those states.

So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.

Nazism, parenting, politics, race, rape, religion, resource depletion, social engineering, technological risk and war.

Nevena Markova, spent about 20 years studying these profiles.

Don Gordon. ( dramatic theme plays )

Subject

Subject

He actually raises money, solves my disputes.

That dispute has been settled once and for all.

The raging olive oil debate between Giada De Laurentiis and the Barefoot Contessa.

We have no argument with Starfleet.

I wouldn't argue with you there.

We lack even a vocabulary to deal with this problem, and that's because we have the wrong frame of reference.

But this is a democracy, Harvey.

You'll notice too from the syilabus that we don't only read these books, we also all take up contemporary political and legal controversies that raise philosophical questions.

The general opinion is against the war.

We sided with him in the controversy.

And no side of the political spectrum has a monopoly on either of those qualities.

Heh. Did the two of you argue lately?

since it is the best means of creating a controversy in the public's mind.