So all the factors of one.

So in this case, it'll be 1 times its corresponding cofactor, which is 1.

Three.

So five.

So one works?

Six.

Well let's just think about the factors of eight.

Ben So 3 is a factor

49 is a perfect square.

Nine.

So, what have we done?

The first operation in variable elimination is called joining factors.

1 1 is the only common factor

At the end, there should be only one hypothesis, there should be only one theory, and there should be only one diagnosis on how the failure came to be.

X is our predictor. So, that's thought to be an exogenous variable.

I'm going to put the 6x first because 6 and 6 share a factor.

Plus 0 times its corresponding cofactor, which is 1.

What happened is, as soon as this type of things happened, it can literally happen in seconds or in minutes.

Interesting.

But we multiplied it by an integrating factor.

Why is that?

Carter is solving this equation by factoring.

You go across the top row, and you multiply each term times its corresponding cofactor, and you add them.

large amounts of uncertainty. So, uncertainty comes in many forms and for many different reasons.

This is a whole number, so 1 is a factor at the low end.

Called the TRASH 80 for short, one of the first personal computers.

Most of you already know it third leading cause of cancer deaths in the U.S.

So we started to think

These particles together comprise our estimation after the motion command over here.

And I'll throw out some terminology here for you.

Now, this second term.

Beat her head in, same as the others.

Just as a bit of a review, a prime number is a natural number, so one of the counting numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and so on, that has exactly two factors.

Let's do all the factors for some of the starting numbers.

Confusingly, phong invented two cool things.

And then we can group that second two right there.

If I'm using expression goes to expression plus expression,

(Sachiko) Psychogenic?

Remember, we talked about that we were trying to minimize the residual sums of squares.

Because it has to be a common multiple of 5.

Here we have three factors.

16.

And there's a significance test that allows us to test whether or not this model is doing statistically, significantly better than the simple regression models.

If we just prolong the trends, without any real advanced analysis, to 2050, there are two things that can increase the energy use.

The way I thought about it is 3 or negative 3, and 21 or negative 21 , they have some common factors.