What we get in here is actually an entire cause effect chain.

Bad weather caused an extreme shortage of food.

So this expression, and that expression is the exact same thing.

The data is often inaccurate.

But even then it will be impossible to know the exact origin.

Well,what exactly happened?

Materials such as that in an unglazed clay pot, concrete, and even the moon itself, are rough enough that the lambertian reflection model doesn't capture them fully.

My English is incorrect.

And here it's really easy to see that there is something wrong, but jumping to an incorrect conclusion about causality when you see a correlation is the most often made logical mistake.

I think I found... I could be wrong.

What did Yang Hyunseok say about this album at first?

And what catalyzed it, there were several things that were catalyzing that

Well, why is this happening?

This watch keeps bad time.

But to answer that question, to make a clear attribution to carbon dioxide, you have to know something about all of these other agents of change.

We're going to look at all the various input sources for your program and discuss how to capture and replay them such that you can faithfully reproduce a failure that happens in the field.

We get that from the census data.

We know the prior probability for A, and we know the conditional.

In the 1920s, we thought there were major differences between people.

This data is incorrect.

What exactly is cheating for you?

They can measure this precisely, just as the scientists could predict precisely how much water would breach the levees in New orleans.

He described exactly what happened.

Most car accidents happen because drivers aren't paying attention.

I know the exact time when that happened.

Let me write this.

I wish they were just a little less precise.

You can execute a program again and again, never have a failure and still have a defect in there, however, if a program fails, that is if we actually see a failure, then we can always trace it back to the defect that causes it.

He doesn't even speak good English.

Well, this is exactly the sort of thing that a programming language

I know exactly how long it's been.

He accurately described what happened there.

Bring down the 4.

G raises an exception well and that's just the messenger. We don't shoot messenger.

We don't know why.

(Laughter)

Life is complicated enough without legal fear.

I do not know exactly.

He said, That is the battle of the self, the battle of the ego.

Ben 1 and 16 are factors, sure

And I began giving her my rap.

(Laughter)

The budget appears to be inaccurate and unrealistic.

Reason unknown

The notion that there is no safe amount of radiation is not a substantiated or even an accurate statement.