He claims it's done based on a UNESCO study.

The city of New York would not exist in 100 years.

And how we get that from a low P value. But for now.

His conclusion is based on these facts.

Since the world was the same as before, the underlying coordinate system itself had not changed.

Because we want to consider every possibility, you know, you don't want to commit to any one theory too soon.

I call it an inevitable conclusion based on reprehensible process of reasoning.

The conclusion rests on a solid basis.

All right, now what do they want us to come to a conclusion?

So why should anyone care?

We should've been done already.

It will only mean an endless debate.

Care to share?

Did you come up with that all by yourself?

We can conclude that this phenomenon is not related to either pollutant.

So based on the same logic, I could equally conclude you hate your iPhone.

You should combine theory with practice.

We constantly created events and arranged meetings

And then you draw the conclusion the odds of winning the lottery are 100 percent.

So what does all this mean?

It all adds up.

Yes! I knew you'd get there eventually.

We're nearing the endgame.

They went on arguing for hours.

Currently, our optimizer can only do 1 optimization.

So, they want to know what deductive reasoning is, so I'm going to go with A.

So they concluded that because they saw activation in the insula, this meant the subjects loved their iPhones.

Maybe we test it out on a bunch of inputs.

we conclude that extreme coercion is necessary to motivate you.

The discussion came to a conclusion.

If you don't provide for them, the technology may work, but the crew won't.

The only difference is the time it took to reach that decision.

Hey, guys. Come on back.

Find you... between midnight and sunrise tomorrow, freedom for both of you.

Let's see if we can find the definition of deductive reasoning in the California Standards language.

And a few friends of mine and I decided this doesn't make sense.

And from a meta analysis of the literature,

Perhaps most importantly, he now focuses on the story he wants to tell.

It is important to combine theory with practice.

Hold your horses.

Do you have a point?

The universe is much bigger than our prophet said, grander, more subtle, more elegant'?

Which of the following is a valid conclusion to the statement?

Why are you even thinking this way?

I've been doing a lot of thinking, and the thing is, I love you.