So I don't want to hear about it any more.

The data to be discussed below was collected in the following way.

Joining me in the discussion are Congressman Harold Stern, a proV advocate.

This invitation has been canceled

And back even two or three years ago, when people used to make this argument.

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

listen to at least three radio stations a day.

One is why do we argue? Who benefits from arguments?

Once you go on that vacation, there's nothing left over.

And the tools are highly inaudible so unlike that, that statement that was done before.

For the sake of argument, let's say that

So, we talked about ways in which perhaps one could partner to be able to bring the cost of this technology down.

It's got a semantics.

You're such a debater, M. Pierre.

Define controversial.

Is intellectual property a fair system?

I had him in that discussion.

So that's the, the goal of, of this segment.

There's been much debate over the last few weeks...

This has been confirmed by many, many subsequent observations now we know more of these galaxies.

His argument is more radical than yours.

So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.

I've heard that argument before.

This is not the place to be having this discussion.

And finally this is really the worst thing arguments don't seem to get us anywhere they're dead ends.

Most Western intellectuals

And, you know, it could have worked.

Think about that one have you ever entered an argument thinking,

This invitation is now completed

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,

She argues for the sake of arguing.

She argues just for the sake of arguing.

The president needs to stand up and say, at the end of a healthcare reform debate,

Well, there are some other puzzles.

Because of the oil, everybody talked about the polilution.

Now, can you imagine an argument in which you are the arguer, but you're also in the audience, watching yourself argue?

How does it apply over here? And you answer my question.

We'll talk about a learning algorithm

Because I have nothing to hide.

The matter is not open for debate.

Discuss.

What do you call the leader of a republican country?

So now we have this platform we can build on.

This whole discussion is a waste of time.

Well, now we got some discussing to do. Right here and now.